When will India get its SpaceX?

Canonical URL

Do not index

What Investors are Really Buying

SpaceX earned $18.67 billion in revenue in 2025. Amazon earned $716.9 billion, almost forty times more. And yet SpaceX lists at $1.8 trillion, more than half of Amazon's entire value today. How does that math work?

It works because the market is pricing what only SpaceX can do next, not the revenue it booked this year.

In 2025 the company launched 165 rockets, roughly three a week. The next private operator managed 21 in the whole year. On launch capability alone, that gap could take rivals years to close.

The gap exists because SpaceX kept chasing things the industry had written off as impractical or simply too risky. Many doubted that a rocket taller than a twenty-storey building could fly to space, land upright, be refuelled, and fly again. SpaceX tried it, failed at it repeatedly, and kept going until landing a rocket became routine. Its Starlink satellites run on the same logic: don't agonise over one flawless satellite, launch hundreds, and accept that some won't make it.

This unconventional business model and a risk appetite that stretches to Moon bases and a Mars colony is what the valuation is really about.

SpaceX rockets landing back after launch.

60 Starlink v0.9 satellites stacked together before deployment.

What India actually Needs

The question worth asking, then, is whether our ecosystem can learn to back the kind of risk that produces a SpaceX.

Today, the sector has the momentum and the capital. What's still missing is a shared understanding that failure is part of the price for building something this hard. Without it, when a satellite goes quiet after launch, a setback that should be treated as a data point becomes something to bury instead.

Close that gap and the opportunity becomes obvious. The companies willing to take real risks are the ones worth backing hardest, because a risk you've survived is an advantage a competitor can't simply buy. The ecosystems that learn to place their biggest bets there are the ones that eventually produce a SpaceX.

The American system grasped this and built around it. The government made itself SpaceX's anchor customer, funding rocket development, awarding contracts worth billions, even leasing it launchpads. The size of any single cheque mattered less than how the contracts were written: to pay for the risky work, and to share the loss when things blew up. That kind of patient backing has to begin upstream, with investors who budget for failure from the first day and public institutions willing to do for Indian startups what NASA did for SpaceX.

The Reality of Space

None of this is peculiar to India, or to startups. In space, failure is the baseline you engineer against, not the exception.

You are throwing precision machinery 500 km above the Earth, somewhere no one can reach it to tighten a loose connector. When something goes wrong, you might get ten minutes over a ground station to work out what, before the satellite slips over the horizon and you wait for it to come around again.

Last month, Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket, the one meant to carry Amazon's Kuiper satellites, exploded during a ground test in Florida and destroyed its only launchpad. People say space is hard. That is what they mean.

Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket exploded in a huge fireball during a test in Florida

Looking Ahead

What June 12 showed us is that a willingness to take risk does get rewarded eventually, and how long "eventually" can stretch. Look at everything SpaceX had on its side: Elon Musk, a government prepared to anchor it through every fragile year, a leadership team that mostly stuck around for over a decade. With all of that, the road to this IPO still ran 24 years.

India already has the engineers, the cost advantage, and a space agency with a six-decade legacy of doing more with less. A SpaceX-scale outcome needs the rest of the machinery: money set aside for second and third attempts, buyers, the government first among them, who pay for risky development rather than only finished hardware, and teams judged on what the test data actually showed, including the parts that failed. Build that, and founders can be honest about failure, investors can fund the learning, and the best engineers in the country can build instead of merely assemble.

Space-tech is a long and patient game. If you don't fund the retries then you don't get the breakthroughs.

The day an Indian space startup can report a failed mission honestly and still get funded to fly again is the day the countdown to India’s SpaceX truly begins.

📌

The views expressed are personal.